Changes

Np1sec/Sept9

1,130 bytes added, 9 years ago
Created page with "Preliminary agenda for the September 9th meeting in DC. *Transport assumptions: **Investigating properties offered by XMMP-MUC (and cost of considering other protocols) **Off..."
Preliminary agenda for the September 9th meeting in DC.

*Transport assumptions:
**Investigating properties offered by XMMP-MUC (and cost of considering other protocols)
**Offering reliable transport (deciding if its part of this protocol or part of the transport layer and implications over transcript consistency)

*Transcript consistency:
**Choice between simple consistency for globally order messages or incremental for less reliable transport.
**Figuring out if mpOTR is only responsible for announcing inconsistency or it is also need to try to recover from inconsistency.

*Consistence view:
**mpOTR require that member of each session has the same view of the room before the session starts and all see the same text.
**The DoS attacks that can be applied to consistence room view scenario and its mitigation.
**The benefit of having a shared key or each individual manages their own key.

By the end of the meeting, final protocol specification should be decided, specifically:

*Simple consistency vs incremental consistency
*Requiring a consistent view of the room
*Shared key or independent key

[[Category: mpOTR]]
Bureaucrat, emailconfirmed, administrator, translator
662
edits