https://learn.equalit.ie/mw/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3AMpOTR%2FProtocol_name%2Freply_%285%29Thread:Talk:MpOTR/Protocol name/reply (5) - Revision history2026-05-22T05:07:51ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.23.1https://learn.equalit.ie/mw/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:MpOTR/Protocol_name/reply_(5)&diff=853&oldid=prevVmon: Reply to Protocol name2014-09-29T20:43:06Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:MpOTR/Protocol_name/reply_(2)" title="Thread:Talk:MpOTR/Protocol name/reply (2)">Protocol name</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>OK, now that we were barred from using OTR accronym, my new suggestion is mpSeQ, motivation:<br />
<br />
1. so sound mpSec for multiparty secure (messaging). I believe we are doing more than just being off the record (authentication, consistency, etc). Being provably deniable is just another security aspect of the protocol.<br />
2. eQ for equalit.ie.<br />
3. It might be used for more than instant messaging, so more like multiparty communication or collaboration. So "messaging" part is less crucial to appear in the name.</div>Vmon