https://learn.equalit.ie/mw/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3AMpOTR%2FProtocol_name%2FreplyThread:Talk:MpOTR/Protocol name/reply - Revision history2026-05-22T07:50:59ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.23.1https://learn.equalit.ie/mw/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:MpOTR/Protocol_name/reply&diff=703&oldid=prevInfinity0: Reply to Protocol name2014-08-02T15:42:44Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:MpOTR/Protocol_name" title="Thread:Talk:MpOTR/Protocol name">Protocol name</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>I'm hesitant about "mpOTR". 2-party OTR works well on IRC, even though messages may be dropped. But in the group setting, in order to ensure transcript consistency, you basically require reliability which IRC does not do. So the current proposal can only work for XMPP.</div>Infinity0